In recent years, the construction of safe cities across the country has been in full swing. After several batches of pilot projects, the construction of urban alarm and monitoring systems has been fully implemented. All localities are actively exploring their own construction, application and management models.

The construction of the city's alarm and monitoring system is a brand-new topic. It can be said that there is no ready-made experience. It can only touch the stones and cross the river to advance in exploration. During the construction process, some cities even went through some detours. Some cities that started to build systems earlier started to adopt the self-construction model. The government has invested once, and has not considered the issues such as funds and technical support for later maintenance. After completion, due to the front-end camera working 24 hours a day, the wind and the sun, coupled with equipment maintenance, repairs and updates can not keep up, resulting in many systems can not be used normally, can not be effective. Later, some cities began to try to adopt the mode of construction funded by operators and government lease. The operator is responsible for the construction of the capital contribution, and is responsible for maintenance, upgrading and replacement. The government pays the construction cost in installments by instalments.

At the beginning, participating in the bidding for the safe city project included operators, security integrators and engineering companies. The final win is possible. Since then, security integrators and engineering companies have become increasingly less likely to win bids, and operators have become increasingly prominent. Now, even in some provinces and cities, only three major operators are invited to bid, and contractors are selected among operators to directly exclude security companies. In the end, regardless of who won the bid, they were operators rather than security companies. This is obviously unfair to security companies, but it also has no alternative.

Then why did Safe City choose the operator?

First of all, the Safe City project is a key project of the government and it is often designated as "a practical project for the people." Such large projects are handed over to security companies, especially security companies that lack strength, and some people do not trust. In the unlikely event that there is a slippage, or if the company shuts down on a business day, who will be repaired and maintained in the future,

How to confess? On strength, security companies and operators are not a heavyweight at all. Coupled with the large number of security companies nowadays, they can't immediately distinguish between good and bad, good and bad. As for the three major operators, their strengths are known. Basically, they need not be examined.

Second, although operators are now also corporate in nature, they are not ordinary companies and are governments. They can assume certain social responsibilities. As a local government, the project gave them peace of mind and peace of mind.

For operators, even if the project does not make money, they will take it seriously for strategic planning and long-term consideration. In the first phase, the benefits may not be seen because there are few monitoring points. After the second and third phases have been launched, the benefits will be considerable. What they value is not how much money the project construction itself will earn, but the long-term operating income. Just like the telecommunication business, this is the operator's consistent profit model, otherwise it will not be called the "operator."

Thirdly, the operator's outlets are spread all over the country, and their local branch offices will never be withdrawn because they have already taken root in the local area. Security companies are out of reach. Even if they have strength, the local branch offices or offices are mostly temporary. If the market fails to develop, they may withdraw. If you don't have strength, you can't guarantee it.

Fourth, network resources are in the hands of operators. Whether they are networked alarms or 3G monitoring, they must use their networks. With this advantage, no security integrator or contractor can do it.

Fifth, operators have a strong financial advantage, and they can invest in capital construction. This advantage is also not available in most security companies. The construction of the deposits will be very attractive to those cities where the government does not have much funds to build the system. Because there is no money, sometimes it cannot be done. Just like buying a house, there is no money or money, you can only rely on bank loans. At home, such cities account for the majority.

The accumulation of these advantages makes operators become "lucky children" in the construction of safe cities.